📄
StatusToday · Today
Claude billing update: June 15 changes paused
Subscription-authenticated usage still draws from plan limits. API and cloud-provider usage is billed separately.
See the diagram ->

AI is changing software development. The organization must adapt.

We help engineering teams put AI to work: training people, defining responsibilities, delegating to agents and strengthening review. The goal is reliable software, clear accountability and measurable results.

For engineering leaders · platform teams · product organizations · software delivery teams

The core gap

Copilot licenses are not an AI strategy.

Becoming AI‑first starts with individual experimentation, grows through shared practices and communities, and reshapes how work is organized. People discover better ways to work with AI, help others adopt them, and redesign workflows around human judgment and AI capabilities.

Becoming an AI-first organization

Experiment widely. Codify what works. Redesign how work gets done.

Explore AI across real work, identify the practices that create value, spread them through the organization, and redesign workflows around what humans and AI each do best.

Swipe to explore the three stages →

  1. 01

    Explore

    Discover AI-first ways of working

    Build the habit of asking: “How would I do this with AI first?”

    Explore planning, analysis, writing, coding, testing, documentation, research, coordination and decision preparation.

    Who
    Individuals · Teams · Early adopters
    How
    Try AI across real work · Compare human-first and AI-first approaches · Share discoveries
    Evidence
    Tasks transformed · Time & quality gains · New workflows discovered · Failure modes
    Controls
    Approved tools · Data boundaries · Safe experimentation
  2. 02

    Codify

    Turn discoveries into shared practices

    Identify what works, make it teachable, and spread it through the community.

    Capture effective workflows, prompts and agent patterns. Turn personal discoveries into organizational knowledge.

    Who
    Practitioners · AI ambassadors · Managers · Domain experts
    How
    Document patterns · Create playbooks · Run peer demos · Develop ambassadors · Coach others
    Evidence
    Practices reused by others · Adoption beyond the original user · Consistent quality · Learning velocity
    Controls
    Peer review · Named owners · Practice standards · Appropriate human verification
  3. 03

    Redesign

    Make AI-first the default operating model

    Reorganize workflows around what humans and AI each do best.

    Update handoffs, responsibilities and review mechanisms. Automate selected steps where appropriate.

    Who
    Team leads · Business owners · Technical owners · Transformation leaders
    How
    Redesign workflows · Reallocate human/AI tasks · Update roles · Embed proven practices
    Evidence
    Adoption across teams · End-to-end cycle time · Quality · Capacity created · Business impact
    Controls
    Accountability · Quality gates · Monitoring · Escalation · Recovery

Humans + AI: choose how work gets done

AI produces → human judges → AI revises → human decides

Some workflows may evolve from human-first → AI-assisted → AI-first → partially autonomous. More autonomy is not the right destination for every task.

Choose the allocation based on risk, judgment required, reversibility, quality requirements and business context.

Community & learning throughout. Share discoveries · Build playbooks · Develop ambassadors · Coach peers

Governance throughout. Controls grow with impact, autonomy and reliance.

Don’t scale automations. Scale new ways of working.

AI-first becomes an organizational capability when discoveries turn into shared practices — and shared practices reshape how work is organized.

BEFORE YOU SCALE AI, CAN YOUR TEAM ANSWER THESE?

01 / 06
Delegation

What should engineers delegate to AI?

Can your team answer this today?

Scroll to explore, or choose a question above.

Agentic SDLC closes the gap between individual AI usage and reliable software delivery.

The offer

One sprint to define how your teams will work with AI.

We work with your engineering, product and platform teams to map current AI use, assess the opportunities and risks, define responsibilities and controls, and prepare your first pilots.

You leave with a practical plan for the next 30, 60 and 90 days.

Review of current AI use

Understand how AI coding tools are already used across teams, where value is emerging, and where risks appear.

AI maturity assessment

Position teams on a practical maturity scale, from ad-hoc usage to orchestrated agentic workflows.

Roles, workflows and responsibilities

Define how AI-assisted delivery should work across roles, workflows, supervision, review, quality, and governance.

Training for key roles

Align engineers, tech leads, product managers, QA, platform teams, and delivery managers on how work changes.

Metrics and reporting dashboard

Define the signals needed to measure adoption, AI contribution, quality, rework, velocity, cost, and team confidence.

30/60/90-day roadmap

Leave with a pragmatic implementation plan and the first pilots to launch.

Sprint outcome: your Agentic SDLC blueprint

AI Engineering Maturity Scale

Where does your team stand?

Self-Assessment for Executives

5 stages from ad-hoc AI usage to full fleet orchestration. Click any level to explore what it means and how to advance.

L2selected level

Key takeaway: AI maturity is not defined by the tools you buy, but by the autonomy of your CI/CD pipelines and the discipline of your supervision model.

Working with coding agents: the engineering skills that matter

Five practical modules on specifying tasks, equipping agents, checking their work and coordinating delivery.

Five practical modules · Build reliable agentic engineering habits
  1. Module 1: Master the agent workflow

    • Experiment with agents across analysis, coding, debugging, and documentation.
    • Understand planning, tool use, context limits, and feedback loops.
    • Recognize when to steer, restart, or take over.

    Practice: Complete a familiar engineering task with an agent and examine where your intervention mattered.

    Explore

  2. Module 2: Specify and delegate

    • Define the objective, constraints, invariants, and acceptance criteria.
    • Break work into bounded, independently verifiable changes.
    • Surface assumptions and resolve uncertainty before execution.

    Practice: Turn an ambiguous request into an executable task brief.

    Specify

  3. Module 3: Equip the agent

    • Prepare repository instructions, architectural context, and useful examples.
    • Make tools, builds, tests, and diagnostics accessible.
    • Set permissions, execution boundaries, and stopping rules.

    Practice: Prepare a real repository for repeatable agent-assisted development.

    Equip

  4. Module 4: Verify and debug

    • Review behavior, architecture, and the actual changes.
    • Challenge agent-written tests against requirements and known failure cases.
    • Investigate regressions, edge cases, and performance issues before accepting the result.

    Practice: Find a deliberately introduced defect and produce a reviewed change with validation evidence.

    Verify

  5. Module 5: Orchestrate and own delivery

    • Coordinate agents where tasks can be separated, and manage integration.
    • Establish review gates, escalation, release checks, and recovery.
    • Measure completed work, review effort, rework, time, and cost.

    Practice: Deliver a bounded change through a repeatable workflow your team can reuse.

    Orchestrate

Module 5 builds on the foundations established in Modules 1–4

Finish with a working software change, evidence that it meets the requirements and a workflow your team can reuse.

Classify the task, not the person.

Apply the right level of discipline based on the consequences of failure.

Internal tools can carry high risk.

Internal systems can still impact people, data, operations and reputation.

More agents ≠ stronger assurance.

Assurance comes from discipline, controls and accountability, not agent count.

Autonomy earns trust through evidence, enforced controls and human accountability.

Inside the agent toolkit

Claude Agent SDK, slide by slide

Explore the loop, tools, hooks and guardrails behind an agent. Select a slide to take a closer look.

13 slides · Original deck in English
Metrics

Is AI actually improving software delivery?

We combine delivery data with quarterly feedback from your teams to track quality, lead time, rework, review effort and cost. Together, these measures show where AI helps, where it creates extra work and what needs to change.

Delivery data · Continuous

What the System Produces

Five groups of metrics track AI use, software quality, delivery performance, agent behavior and cost throughout the development workflow.

  1. AI adoption

    Who is using AI, where, and how often.

    • Active users
    • Tool Adoption Rate
  2. Acceptance & Quality

    Whether the output is trusted enough to ship.

    • Acceptance rate
    • Defect rate
    • Change in test coverage
  3. Velocity

    DORA metrics, segmented by agent involvement.

    • Lead time
    • Deployment frequency
    • Change failure rate
  4. Agent Behavior

    How well agents operate within their guardrails.

    • Escalation quality
    • Supervision burden
    • Goal completion
  5. Cost & Return

    Whether the economics are improving.

    • Token spend
    • Cost per accepted change
Team feedback · Quarterly

What people experience

A quarterly survey combines a shared set of questions with questions tailored to each respondent’s role.

Common baselineFor every respondent

Calibrates role, engagement model, AI usage frequency, autonomy level, and learning posture — the context every other answer is read against.

  • DeveloperCoding-side branch

    Covers how AI shows up across the day-to-day developer loop, from authoring to verification, and how agentic tooling is adopted.

  • QA · Automation · Release QualityQuality-side branch

    Covers AI in the test lifecycle — from scenario generation through maintenance, flakiness, and release-readiness decisions.

  • PM · PO · BA · OpsDelivery-side branch

    Covers AI across planning, documentation, reporting, risk, and operational signals — the work around the code.

The questionnaire is proprietary and is provided as part of the engagement.

Next steps

From first sprint to scaled adoption

The first sprint creates the blueprint. The next step is implementation through pilots, training, and operating metrics.

After the initial sprint, organizations can move into targeted adoption programs: team pilots, role-based training, workflow redesign, measurement, and governance support.

Launch a team pilot

Select one or two engineering teams and redesign their delivery workflow around AI-assisted execution.

Role-based training

Train developers, tech leads, product managers, QA, platform teams, and delivery managers on how their work changes.

Workflow redesign

Define repeatable patterns for specification, coding, testing, review, documentation, migration, refactoring, and maintenance.

Platform and tooling alignment

Connect AI coding tools with repositories, documentation, CI/CD, policy checks, and internal engineering standards.

Set up measurement

Track adoption, quality, velocity, AI contribution, rework, cost, and team confidence.

Governance and supervision

Create practical rules for what AI can do, what humans must review, and how accountability is preserved.

Audience

Who Agentic SDLC is for

Built for organizations that need AI speed with delivery accountability.

Engineering leaders

You need to understand whether AI coding tools are creating real productivity, where risks are emerging, and how to scale adoption safely.

Platform and tooling teams

You need to integrate AI tools into the engineering environment: repositories, CI/CD, documentation, identity, policies, and internal standards.

Product and delivery leaders

You need to understand how AI changes planning, estimation, review, quality, and delivery predictability.

Software delivery organizations

You need to prepare for a shift from staffing-based delivery to measurable AI-enabled execution.

Nicolas Boitout, Lead Expert — AI Engineering and Digital Transformation Expert, Founder of Agentic SDLC.
Start the conversation

Where could AI make a difference in your engineering teams?

Start with a conversation about your current practices and priorities: skills, workflows, quality or measurement.

No generic AI evangelism. No tool-only training. The focus is delivery: workflows, quality, supervision, metrics, and adoption.